IIRC, 80k stopped using their DIPY(?) metric several years ago.
If you look through their recent reports, they mostly share metrics related to engagement with their programmes/services. And then occasionally there is an additional survey, e.g., the job board survey in their H2 2025 report.
From what I understand, CG likes grantees to report individual narrative case studies, and then these are coded. At least, that’s how it works for the CEA’s CBG programme. So maybe that’s what 80k does as well? And then this is supplemented with engagement metrics.
If that’s the case, it’s pretty similar to CEA’s system.
Do you know how this compares to 80ks similar metric? I dunno, seems a bit weak (only counts careers, not how they differ, no attempt at attribution)
IIRC, 80k stopped using their DIPY(?) metric several years ago.
If you look through their recent reports, they mostly share metrics related to engagement with their programmes/services. And then occasionally there is an additional survey, e.g., the job board survey in their H2 2025 report.
From what I understand, CG likes grantees to report individual narrative case studies, and then these are coded. At least, that’s how it works for the CEA’s CBG programme. So maybe that’s what 80k does as well? And then this is supplemented with engagement metrics.
If that’s the case, it’s pretty similar to CEA’s system.