This is an inevitable issue with the post being 70 pages long.
I think online discussions are more productive when its clear exactly what is being proposed as good/bad, so I appreciate you separately commenting on small segments (which can be addressed individually) rather than the post as a whole.
No. I do think that combining the comments would yield less karma, which could be a bad thing and—in the spirit of this post—in need of being done better, thereby not saying anything about your intentions. And I agree with your reply to your comment: therefore the “and”. And I think what you say there is actually a very good reason, which also answers why I was reading all these distinct comments by you, which is in turn why I appreciated this one amongst them and responded. I’m sorry if it came across as an ad hominem attack instead! Best!
Nathan commenting atomistically is frustrating and I wish he’d put them all in one comment.
[aside, made me chuckle]
This is an inevitable issue with the post being 70 pages long.
I think online discussions are more productive when its clear exactly what is being proposed as good/bad, so I appreciate you separately commenting on small segments (which can be addressed individually) rather than the post as a whole.
Okay, but like they are all separate points. Putting them all into one comment means it’s much harder to signal that you like some but not others.
And likely yields less karma overall!
Sorry you think this is a play to get more karma?
No. I do think that combining the comments would yield less karma, which could be a bad thing and—in the spirit of this post—in need of being done better, thereby not saying anything about your intentions. And I agree with your reply to your comment: therefore the “and”. And I think what you say there is actually a very good reason, which also answers why I was reading all these distinct comments by you, which is in turn why I appreciated this one amongst them and responded. I’m sorry if it came across as an ad hominem attack instead! Best!
Thanks for the clarification :)