I haven’t looked into it, I think GiveWell recommended charities make up a very small percentage of most countries NGO workforce, so it seems unlikely to be much of a difference.
i agree that is unlikely to make a paradigm shifting different to their cost effectiveness, but i doubt see how the “percentage of an NGO workforce” employed is important to answer this question? i would think about it something like (good done—this negative externality).
That makes sense, thanks David. I note that GiveWell often works with governments to scale up a program (e.g. CHAI), which seems like it would protect against the risk of a decrease in government funding.
On the other hand, New Incentives is opposed by government.
I haven’t looked into it, I think GiveWell recommended charities make up a very small percentage of most countries NGO workforce, so it seems unlikely to be much of a difference.
i agree that is unlikely to make a paradigm shifting different to their cost effectiveness, but i doubt see how the “percentage of an NGO workforce” employed is important to answer this question? i would think about it something like (good done—this negative externality).
That makes sense, thanks David. I note that GiveWell often works with governments to scale up a program (e.g. CHAI), which seems like it would protect against the risk of a decrease in government funding.
On the other hand, New Incentives is opposed by government.