I found it super encouraging seeing such a wide range of org focuses and types across a wide range of geographies, with lots of them exciting me—especially some of the “firsts” and pioneering stuff.
Would encourage others to apply in future too, 17% is a reasonably high acceptance rate so the application may well be worth the effort.
Would encourage others to apply in future too, 17% is a reasonably high acceptance rate so the application may well be worth the effort.
Definitely agree that more people should apply! And I think AWF’s non-desk rejected acceptance rate (27%) is more representative for the type of applications that forum readers are likely to send in (e.g., projects actually related to improving animal welfare for large numbers of animals).
I found it super encouraging seeing such a wide range of org focuses and types across a wide range of geographies, with lots of them exciting me—especially some of the “firsts” and pioneering stuff.
Would encourage others to apply in future too, 17% is a reasonably high acceptance rate so the application may well be worth the effort.
Definitely agree that more people should apply! And I think AWF’s non-desk rejected acceptance rate (27%) is more representative for the type of applications that forum readers are likely to send in (e.g., projects actually related to improving animal welfare for large numbers of animals).