Thanks for sharing, this is a pretty incredible list. The bar for good EA work just keeps on rising.
I have gratitude fatigue from all the people/efforts I am grateful for :)
For 3 - I think that shared Mendeley databases, are a good choice for synthesising and sharing research. New research is suggested, the web clipper makes it easy to add and the shared group mean that many people can contribute. It can also be combined with research updates from Scopus etc. I do one for Behaviourworks (my employer) for behaviour change research—see here for an update. I am happy to explain how to do it if 3+ people comment that they expect they would probably benefit it.
For 13⁄18 - Thanks for the mention of our project—maybe we can collaborate on getting UK data?
We just collected our first set of Australian data (n=1000) for an open science project. We aim to help policymakers with decision making about how to allocate resources to tackle Covid-19.
We doing something quite different from other ongoing surveys. Most of these are about country level comparisons and not about understanding behavioural drivers. For example, we can report things by location and demographic, but also why people are not doing the behaviours, e.g.,
75% of males between 30 and 40 are social distancing but only 50% of males between 20-30.
At only 55% adherence, the inner west region reports the lowest amount of social distancing. The main capability barriers are commuting and desire to see friends.
97% of those surveyed are always washing their hands, suggesting that this need no longer be a key communication target.
Maroubra shows the lowest levels of life satisfaction and the highest levels of anxiety
Compared to the previous week, emotional concern and risk perception have increased significantly, the population thinks more about Corona and searches for information more often.
Chronically ill people have a higher risk perception and need special support to protect themselves effectively.
The four biggest concerns are health system overload, small business filing for bankruptcy, recession and society becoming more selfish. Measures and information by the government can create security here; Reports of projects based on solidarity may encourage imitation and can reduce social fears.
The list of the 40 or so people currently involved is here.
If anyone would like to know more, take the survey, or help, then please read the following and check the links (copied and pasted to save time—hope that is ok—I am near exhaustion :P!):
Invitation letter
Dear X,
I am part of an open science research collaboration creating an international and continuously-updated dataset to help government and public health officials make better decisions to tackle Covid-19.
Existing COVID-19 related surveys are less optimised for providing immediate actionable insights to policy makers, such as the differences in adherence to key protective behaviours, and the barriers preventing people from performing these behaviours, and how these differ by postcode or demographic. Such data is therefore critical for efficient resource allocation but not currently available.
Building on the COSMO project, a WHO/Europe initiative—we will conduct a “living survey”—with both repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal sampling—running throughout the pandemic, to track relevant protective behaviours, their variations by demographic and location, and their determinants.
After each wave of data collection, we will generate and disseminate an updated report about the prevalence of protective behaviours, their most important drivers or barriers, and a break-down by demographics. As we collect more waves, we will be able to visualise trends over time.
We will also test the effectiveness of different interventions at encouraging relevant behaviours. Here are some examples of the types of outputs that we will be able to produce.
We have just started collecting the first wave of data.
Please consider joining us in collaboration. You can contribute by:
Helping to disseminate the survey via social networks or panel data.
Reaching and helping policy makers in your country with the data we collect
Helping to modify our report template to provide useful and interesting information to policy makers.
Developing reports and doing analysis for policy makers
Providing us with feedback based on your discussion data collection
Helping with write up and dissemination when we seek to publish this work
If you contribute to this project in any significant way then you will be recognised on all outputs and be an author on any subsequent paper. The bar for recognition will be relatively low (perhaps ~5 hours of work).
The data we collect and share will not only be invaluable to current policy and decision making but will also provide insights that help to prevent suffering and death.
You can take the survey here [Add your personal link]?Firstname_Lastname_EMAIL
For 3 - I think that shared Mendeley databases, are a good choice for synthesising and sharing research. New research is suggested, the web clipper makes it easy to add and the shared group mean that many people can contribute. It can also be combined with research updates from Scopus etc. I do one for Behaviourworks (my employer) for behaviour change research—see here for an update. I am happy to explain how to do it if 3+ people comment that they expect they would probably benefit it.
I think this is a good idea in the abstract, but I would be especially wary of starting “yet another aggregator” right now… I think we should use the LW links database which already has momentum.
For 13⁄18 - Thanks for the mention of our project—maybe we can collaborate on getting UK data?
Definitely. I think you have been in touch a bit with Derek and David on that. My understanding is it could definitely help but we are funding constrained on the data collection as are you. I shared your opportunity in my 29 March Brief.
I think this is a good idea in the abstract, but I would be especially wary of starting “yet another aggregator” right now… I think we should use the LW links database which already has momentum.
Yes, I agree. To be clear though, one issue now (I suspect) is that you can’t trust the LW links database to be updated with all the key papers on a topic, nor can you search it to find these paper or use it to easily cite those papers. A Mendeley database could do that and in less than a days work. It would only be of use for ‘serious’ research though so not sure if needed. I also don’t have the capacity to do anything to make such a database nor does anyone who could I suspect!
For now, perhaps the LW links database could benefit from someone with research knowledge setting up something to alert them to the latest research as it comes in? I could probably set something something that emails me the latest results from a search (e.g., (Covid-19 OR...) AND (vaccinat* OR …)) and then forward that to someone involved. Of course this may already be happening - I haven’t been able to pay much attention. If this is useful, then let me know and I will look into it.
Definitely. I think you have been in touch a bit with Derek and David on that. My understanding is it could definitely help but we are funding constrained on the data collection as are you. I shared your opportunity in my 29 March Brief.
Yes, they have been very helpful! Thanks for sharing. We will see if we can get more funding for this and if we do then we could potentially pay for that data collection.
Thanks for sharing, this is a pretty incredible list. The bar for good EA work just keeps on rising.
I have gratitude fatigue from all the people/efforts I am grateful for :)
For 3 - I think that shared Mendeley databases, are a good choice for synthesising and sharing research. New research is suggested, the web clipper makes it easy to add and the shared group mean that many people can contribute. It can also be combined with research updates from Scopus etc. I do one for Behaviourworks (my employer) for behaviour change research—see here for an update. I am happy to explain how to do it if 3+ people comment that they expect they would probably benefit it.
For 13⁄18 - Thanks for the mention of our project—maybe we can collaborate on getting UK data?
We just collected our first set of Australian data (n=1000) for an open science project. We aim to help policymakers with decision making about how to allocate resources to tackle Covid-19.
We doing something quite different from other ongoing surveys. Most of these are about country level comparisons and not about understanding behavioural drivers. For example, we can report things by location and demographic, but also why people are not doing the behaviours, e.g.,
75% of males between 30 and 40 are social distancing but only 50% of males between 20-30.
At only 55% adherence, the inner west region reports the lowest amount of social distancing. The main capability barriers are commuting and desire to see friends.
97% of those surveyed are always washing their hands, suggesting that this need no longer be a key communication target.
Maroubra shows the lowest levels of life satisfaction and the highest levels of anxiety
Compared to the previous week, emotional concern and risk perception have increased significantly, the population thinks more about Corona and searches for information more often.
Chronically ill people have a higher risk perception and need special support to protect themselves effectively.
The four biggest concerns are health system overload, small business filing for bankruptcy, recession and society becoming more selfish. Measures and information by the government can create security here; Reports of projects based on solidarity may encourage imitation and can reduce social fears.
The list of the 40 or so people currently involved is here.
If anyone would like to know more, take the survey, or help, then please read the following and check the links (copied and pasted to save time—hope that is ok—I am near exhaustion :P!):
Invitation letter
Dear X,
I am part of an open science research collaboration creating an international and continuously-updated dataset to help government and public health officials make better decisions to tackle Covid-19.
Existing COVID-19 related surveys are less optimised for providing immediate actionable insights to policy makers, such as the differences in adherence to key protective behaviours, and the barriers preventing people from performing these behaviours, and how these differ by postcode or demographic. Such data is therefore critical for efficient resource allocation but not currently available.
Building on the COSMO project, a WHO/Europe initiative—we will conduct a “living survey”—with both repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal sampling—running throughout the pandemic, to track relevant protective behaviours, their variations by demographic and location, and their determinants.
After each wave of data collection, we will generate and disseminate an updated report about the prevalence of protective behaviours, their most important drivers or barriers, and a break-down by demographics. As we collect more waves, we will be able to visualise trends over time.
We will also test the effectiveness of different interventions at encouraging relevant behaviours. Here are some examples of the types of outputs that we will be able to produce.
We have just started collecting the first wave of data.
Please consider joining us in collaboration. You can contribute by:
Helping to disseminate the survey via social networks or panel data.
Reaching and helping policy makers in your country with the data we collect
Helping to modify our report template to provide useful and interesting information to policy makers.
Developing reports and doing analysis for policy makers
Providing us with feedback based on your discussion data collection
Helping with write up and dissemination when we seek to publish this work
If you contribute to this project in any significant way then you will be recognised on all outputs and be an author on any subsequent paper. The bar for recognition will be relatively low (perhaps ~5 hours of work).
The data we collect and share will not only be invaluable to current policy and decision making but will also provide insights that help to prevent suffering and death.
You can take the survey here [Add your personal link]?Firstname_Lastname_EMAIL
You can join the collaboration here
Best wishes,
X
I think this is a good idea in the abstract, but I would be especially wary of starting “yet another aggregator” right now… I think we should use the LW links database which already has momentum.
Definitely. I think you have been in touch a bit with Derek and David on that. My understanding is it could definitely help but we are funding constrained on the data collection as are you. I shared your opportunity in my 29 March Brief.
Yes, I agree. To be clear though, one issue now (I suspect) is that you can’t trust the LW links database to be updated with all the key papers on a topic, nor can you search it to find these paper or use it to easily cite those papers. A Mendeley database could do that and in less than a days work. It would only be of use for ‘serious’ research though so not sure if needed. I also don’t have the capacity to do anything to make such a database nor does anyone who could I suspect!
For now, perhaps the LW links database could benefit from someone with research knowledge setting up something to alert them to the latest research as it comes in? I could probably set something something that emails me the latest results from a search (e.g., (Covid-19 OR...) AND (vaccinat* OR …)) and then forward that to someone involved. Of course this may already be happening - I haven’t been able to pay much attention. If this is useful, then let me know and I will look into it.
Yes, they have been very helpful! Thanks for sharing. We will see if we can get more funding for this and if we do then we could potentially pay for that data collection.