I’m curious to hear the perceived downsides about this. All I can think of is logistical overhead, which doesn’t seem like that much.
If something is called the “Coordination Forum” and previously called the “Leaders Forum” and there is a “leaders” slack where further coordination that affects the community takes place, it seems fair that people should at least know who is attending them. The community prides itself on transparency and knowing the leaders of your movement seems like one of the obvious first steps of transparency.
I think that if you have an intense focus on leaders you end up with leaders who can bare that intense focus. I guess I sense that there is something good in this area, but that this specific suggestion would be -EV
I strongly doubt we can get anything positive long-term from a leader working in the shadows without public scrutiny. This is a recipe for mismanagement and corruption.
The identity of those who attend the coordination forum and are on leaders slack channels should be made public
I’m curious to hear the perceived downsides about this. All I can think of is logistical overhead, which doesn’t seem like that much.
If something is called the “Coordination Forum” and previously called the “Leaders Forum” and there is a “leaders” slack where further coordination that affects the community takes place, it seems fair that people should at least know who is attending them. The community prides itself on transparency and knowing the leaders of your movement seems like one of the obvious first steps of transparency.
I think that if you have an intense focus on leaders you end up with leaders who can bare that intense focus. I guess I sense that there is something good in this area, but that this specific suggestion would be -EV
I strongly doubt we can get anything positive long-term from a leader working in the shadows without public scrutiny. This is a recipe for mismanagement and corruption.
I think I don’t want this, but I think there is something interesting in this space.
I agree with the first but not the second