Thank you. It was quite a lot of work to get the piece into a good shape.
I’m guessing you’d need to bump up your estimate by ~100x or so
This seems way too high. I can see a case for 5x. I would be shocked to find out that in total EA HR depts receive 100x as many complaints as CH.
The factor of 3 thing is less clear. I think I can see an argument in the other direction: if it’s due to the number of badly behaved men, and in some ways EA might compare even more favourably to the university contexts. This feels like the sort of thing that one shouldn’t do when one is estimating. Seems better just to present the numbers as they are.
You want to try and make a case for why it’s clearly a multiple in that direction, not the other direction, then I might think about it and add it to the chart.
You seem to be taking the premise on board that we can do this kind of math. If you became convinced that a reasonable estimate was on the low end of comparable communities, would you agree with the conclusions of the article?
Thank you. It was quite a lot of work to get the piece into a good shape.
This seems way too high. I can see a case for 5x. I would be shocked to find out that in total EA HR depts receive 100x as many complaints as CH.
The factor of 3 thing is less clear. I think I can see an argument in the other direction: if it’s due to the number of badly behaved men, and in some ways EA might compare even more favourably to the university contexts. This feels like the sort of thing that one shouldn’t do when one is estimating. Seems better just to present the numbers as they are.
You want to try and make a case for why it’s clearly a multiple in that direction, not the other direction, then I might think about it and add it to the chart.
You seem to be taking the premise on board that we can do this kind of math. If you became convinced that a reasonable estimate was on the low end of comparable communities, would you agree with the conclusions of the article?