I don’t think the section is written to be misleading in a generic sense. The section is written to be misleading in a very specific way by drawing an analogy to how information in Ben’s post was presented. I don’t see any candidate analogy for this kind of misleadingness in Ben’s post.
I don’t think the section is written to be misleading in a generic sense. The section is written to be misleading in a very specific way by drawing an analogy to how information in Ben’s post was presented. I don’t see any candidate analogy for this kind of misleadingness in Ben’s post.