I’m disappointed that much of this document involves attacking the people who’ve accused you of harmful actions, in place of a focus on disputing the evidence they provided
The vast majority of what they gave is disputing the evidence. There is a whole 135 pages of basically nothing but that. You then even refer to it saying:
I don’t have time to engage with all the evidence here
How can both these be true at once? Either it’s a lot so you don’t have time to go through it all or they haven’t done much in which case you should be able to spend some time looking at it?
I don’t think I, as a reader, am obliged to review all the evidence here and adjudicate with full information. You certainly shouldn’t read my comment as me implying I’ve done that.
This post struck me as unpleasant and off the mark in the ways I describe it, and I think it’s okay for me to just say that.
The vast majority of what they gave is disputing the evidence. There is a whole 135 pages of basically nothing but that. You then even refer to it saying:
How can both these be true at once? Either it’s a lot so you don’t have time to go through it all or they haven’t done much in which case you should be able to spend some time looking at it?
I think it’s not actually accurate to say that
as it’s constantly interspersed with stuff like how great it is to work in a hot tub.
I don’t think I, as a reader, am obliged to review all the evidence here and adjudicate with full information. You certainly shouldn’t read my comment as me implying I’ve done that.
This post struck me as unpleasant and off the mark in the ways I describe it, and I think it’s okay for me to just say that.