Whilst it does provide evidence in favour of it being possible to make EA enormous, I actually think that it reduces the case for this overall, since it means that this “gap in the market” is now mostly being addressed[1]. Attempting to compete with the School of Moral Ambition for broad appeal would likely involve watering down elements of EA and I’d much prefer a world where we have these two different movements pursuing two different theories of impacts, instead of two movements pursuing mostly the same theory of impact.
Whilst it does provide evidence in favour of it being possible to make EA enormous, I actually think that it reduces the case for this overall, since it means that this “gap in the market” is now mostly being addressed[1]. Attempting to compete with the School of Moral Ambition for broad appeal would likely involve watering down elements of EA and I’d much prefer a world where we have these two different movements pursuing two different theories of impacts, instead of two movements pursuing mostly the same theory of impact.
Not completely, since there are differences, but the gap in the market is now much smaller
Oh yes I agree.
Edit: I’ve written more about how I see EA Netherlands in relation to SMA here.