Iām surprised that the ātop 10ā doesnāt include Denmark, Austria, Belgium, and Germany, since they all have more population-adjusted participants than Ireland, are not English-speaking, are more distant from London, and have lower GDP per capita[1]
Are we using different data?
In general, Iām a bit sceptical of these analyses, compared to looking at the countries/ācities with the most participants in absolute terms. I also expect Claude to make lots of random mistakes.
But absolute terms isnāt very useful if weāre trying to spot success stories, right? Or am I misunderstanding something?
But yeah, something seems off about Ireland. The rest of the list feels quite good though. David Moss said they have some per capita estimates in the pipeline, so Iām excited to see what they produce!
Iām surprised that the ātop 10ā doesnāt include Denmark, Austria, Belgium, and Germany, since they all have more population-adjusted participants than Ireland, are not English-speaking, are more distant from London, and have lower GDP per capita[1]
Are we using different data?
In general, Iām a bit sceptical of these analyses, compared to looking at the countries/ācities with the most participants in absolute terms. I also expect Claude to make lots of random mistakes.
But of course, Irelandās GDP is very artificial
But absolute terms isnāt very useful if weāre trying to spot success stories, right? Or am I misunderstanding something?
But yeah, something seems off about Ireland. The rest of the list feels quite good though. David Moss said they have some per capita estimates in the pipeline, so Iām excited to see what they produce!