Very interesting, thank you!
Potential typo: In the following paragraph, I think “likely yes” should probably read “very probably yes”.
Although incomplete, there is direct evidence that individuals of these taxa exhibit features which, according to expert agreement, seem to be necessary –although not sufficient– for consciousness (Bateson, 1991; Broom, 2013; EFSA, 2005; Elwood, 2011; Fiorito, 1986; Sneddon et al., 2014; Sneddon, 2017) (see the first criterion of the ‘likely yes’ category);
(Super minor: It also seems slightly inconsistent that the section title “Very Probably Yes” is capitalized, while others aren’t.)
Fixed!
You’re right! Thanks for your feedback, Max Daniel! We’ll correct that shortly.
Very interesting, thank you!
Potential typo: In the following paragraph, I think “likely yes” should probably read “very probably yes”.
(Super minor: It also seems slightly inconsistent that the section title “Very Probably Yes” is capitalized, while others aren’t.)
Fixed!
You’re right! Thanks for your feedback, Max Daniel! We’ll correct that shortly.