Some of the organizations you listed had representatives invited who either did not attend or did not fill out the survey. [...] If everyone invited had filled it out, I think the list of represented organizations would look more diverse by your criteria.
Depends a bit on how much you mean to stretch the word “some”… This is false as far as I can tell.. at best I would describe your comment as highly misleading.
I’m not sure what you mean, Peter, but I’ll try to be more clear. Of the seven organizations listed in the comment to which I replied, three of them had people invited, according to the list of people who were recorded as having been sent the invite email.
How did you interpret the word “some”? Is there another sense in which you saw the comment as misleading?
I’m sorry. I was reading uncharitably and wrote too quickly. Your latest response sounds clear and fair to me. Thanks for providing the numbers and I’m sorry for misjudging the situation.
Depends a bit on how much you mean to stretch the word “some”… This is false as far as I can tell.. at best I would describe your comment as highly misleading.
I’m not sure what you mean, Peter, but I’ll try to be more clear. Of the seven organizations listed in the comment to which I replied, three of them had people invited, according to the list of people who were recorded as having been sent the invite email.
How did you interpret the word “some”? Is there another sense in which you saw the comment as misleading?
I’m sorry. I was reading uncharitably and wrote too quickly. Your latest response sounds clear and fair to me. Thanks for providing the numbers and I’m sorry for misjudging the situation.