I agree it is confusing but I prefer to just fund impactful things and worry less about what fits in the scope of the fund. And even if the other fund managers deem it out of scope, I frequently can refer it to other interested funders.
Interesting, thanks! Do you happen to have in mind a recent example of a non-infrastructure intervention that was funded directly or indirectly through the Infrastructure Fund?
The best example I have right now is that I funded a climate change research group but arguably research is still infrastructure… I’d like to fund some more direct stuff though
I agree it is confusing but I prefer to just fund impactful things and worry less about what fits in the scope of the fund. And even if the other fund managers deem it out of scope, I frequently can refer it to other interested funders.
Interesting, thanks!
Do you happen to have in mind a recent example of a non-infrastructure intervention that was funded directly or indirectly through the Infrastructure Fund?
The best example I have right now is that I funded a climate change research group but arguably research is still infrastructure… I’d like to fund some more direct stuff though