I see, so an EA deontologist would be an EA with a deontological side-constraint and who is otherwise utilitarian with his positive impact.
You seem to be framing this as if deontology is just side constraints with a base of utilitarianism. That’s not how deontology works—it’s an entire class of ethical frameworks on its own.
I see, so an EA deontologist would be an EA with a deontological side-constraint and who is otherwise utilitarian with his positive impact.
You seem to be framing this as if deontology is just side constraints with a base of utilitarianism. That’s not how deontology works—it’s an entire class of ethical frameworks on its own.