Yeah, I think those are useful analogies/ādata points to draw on, and that sort of thing plays a role in my views as well. Though I feel like, to be confident that recovery was likely, Iād want to be much more specific about what type, speed, and severity of collapse weāre talking about, and what type of recovery weāre talking about (e.g., does it include recovering our current moral norms, or just current GDP?). And Iād also want to flesh out the analogies more. (Iāve sketched out a research project vaguely along those lines, and might hopefully pursue it some day.)
A small example of why: I think the fall of the Roman Empire can validly be called a large-scale collapse, but as far as Iām aware it was quite gradual, and many parts of the world were unaffected, and those that were affected still retained many elements of ācivilizationā. I think GCR researchers are often talking about quite a different type of collapse scenario. (But one could also perhaps argue that the type of scenario theyāre talking about is less likely.)
With this in mind, I think the last sentence of the Garfinkel quote is also probably worth including: āBut I havenāt thought enough about civilizational recovery or, for example, future biological weapons to feel firm in my higher level of optimism.ā
Yeah, I think those are useful analogies/ādata points to draw on, and that sort of thing plays a role in my views as well. Though I feel like, to be confident that recovery was likely, Iād want to be much more specific about what type, speed, and severity of collapse weāre talking about, and what type of recovery weāre talking about (e.g., does it include recovering our current moral norms, or just current GDP?). And Iād also want to flesh out the analogies more. (Iāve sketched out a research project vaguely along those lines, and might hopefully pursue it some day.)
A small example of why: I think the fall of the Roman Empire can validly be called a large-scale collapse, but as far as Iām aware it was quite gradual, and many parts of the world were unaffected, and those that were affected still retained many elements of ācivilizationā. I think GCR researchers are often talking about quite a different type of collapse scenario. (But one could also perhaps argue that the type of scenario theyāre talking about is less likely.)
With this in mind, I think the last sentence of the Garfinkel quote is also probably worth including: āBut I havenāt thought enough about civilizational recovery or, for example, future biological weapons to feel firm in my higher level of optimism.ā