I obviously know little of the billionaire shadow cabal which runs the world, but I’ll comment on this:
Establishing a prominent, highly visible, highly scalable flagship project could greatly increase publicity and the receptiveness of high net worth individuals.
I’ve founded a few advocacy orgs before. People seem much more enthusiastic to support a big ambitious project than a disparate bunch of good ideas. Currently, there are multiple fairly small established organisations, but nothing like The Gates Foundation seeks to eradicate malaria. In practical terms, there’s no reason why multiple highly effective initiatives are less worth funding, but it’s a psychology thing IMO.
I obviously know little of the billionaire shadow cabal which runs the world, but I’ll comment on this:
Establishing a prominent, highly visible, highly scalable flagship project could greatly increase publicity and the receptiveness of high net worth individuals.
I’ve founded a few advocacy orgs before. People seem much more enthusiastic to support a big ambitious project than a disparate bunch of good ideas. Currently, there are multiple fairly small established organisations, but nothing like The Gates Foundation seeks to eradicate malaria. In practical terms, there’s no reason why multiple highly effective initiatives are less worth funding, but it’s a psychology thing IMO.
Do correct me if you think this is wrong, haha.
Downvoting this due to the first sentence, which alleges a cabal of billionaires running the world with effectively zero evidence.
I believe that was a joke66%.
Makes sense to me!