In scientometrics, there is a literature on “Sleeping Beauties”—papers whose relevance has not been recognized for decades, but then suddenly become highly influential and cited. The Einstein paper “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” is a popular example of this.
In scientometrics, there is a literature on “Sleeping Beauties”—papers whose relevance has not been recognized for decades, but then suddenly become highly influential and cited. The Einstein paper “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” is a popular example of this.
This is a quote from somewhere? From where?
Sorry if that was unclear, but it’s the title of the paper by Einstein:
https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777
It’s also known as the Paradox paper- which is where you might know it from:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox
I think Eli was asking whether your whole response was a quote, since the whole thing is in block quote format.
Oops- that was accidental. I wrote that paragraph. Have edited this.