What is the ratio of EAs in major altruistic movements such as global poverty, animal rights, and environmentalism?
All three of those movements have enough supporters that EA is no more than a tiny blip. However, farm animal welfare in particular has been dramatically influenced by a large amount of EA funding into a sub-area of animal welfare that had been relatively obscure. I canât find the reference at the moment, but a 2019 EA Global speaker estimated that the fraction of farm animal welfare funding from EA sources was (if I recall correctly) somewhere between 25% and 50%.
EA-type methodology (though we certainly didnât invent it) has become much more popular among academics and policymakers focused on global poverty (the most recent economics Nobel went to three academics who popularized it). I would guess, from my experiences working with academics in this field, that most such academics are aware that âeffective altruismâ is a thing, and perhaps even that GiveWell exists. I donât know what fraction would self-identify as âEAâ, however.
How âbigâ EA is in governments?
Rachel Glennerster, the head of the UKâs foreign aid department, is an avowed member of the EA movement. Martin Rees, a major longtermist scholar, has been knighted by the British government. A few British MPs are also quite EA-sympathetic.
J-PAL and IPA have placed a lot of advisors (perhaps dozens?) in various developing-country governments over the last few years, being helped in many cases by people inside those governments who were interested in using a quantitative/âexperimental approach. However, I again donât know what fraction of these people would self-identify as âEAâ.
Iâm not aware of any major politicians outside the UK who have made public endorsements of EA or any of EAâs more unusual causes (unless you stretch to include Andrew Yang). But I could easily be unaware of one or more such people!
All three of those movements have enough supporters that EA is no more than a tiny blip. However, farm animal welfare in particular has been dramatically influenced by a large amount of EA funding into a sub-area of animal welfare that had been relatively obscure. I canât find the reference at the moment, but a 2019 EA Global speaker estimated that the fraction of farm animal welfare funding from EA sources was (if I recall correctly) somewhere between 25% and 50%.
EA-type methodology (though we certainly didnât invent it) has become much more popular among academics and policymakers focused on global poverty (the most recent economics Nobel went to three academics who popularized it). I would guess, from my experiences working with academics in this field, that most such academics are aware that âeffective altruismâ is a thing, and perhaps even that GiveWell exists. I donât know what fraction would self-identify as âEAâ, however.
Rachel Glennerster, the head of the UKâs foreign aid department, is an avowed member of the EA movement. Martin Rees, a major longtermist scholar, has been knighted by the British government. A few British MPs are also quite EA-sympathetic.
J-PAL and IPA have placed a lot of advisors (perhaps dozens?) in various developing-country governments over the last few years, being helped in many cases by people inside those governments who were interested in using a quantitative/âexperimental approach. However, I again donât know what fraction of these people would self-identify as âEAâ.
Iâm not aware of any major politicians outside the UK who have made public endorsements of EA or any of EAâs more unusual causes (unless you stretch to include Andrew Yang). But I could easily be unaware of one or more such people!
Thanks! This is helpful, and some of it was really surprising :)