Those answers make sense to me. But I notice that the answer to question 1 sounds like an outcome you want to bring about, but which I wouldnāt be way more surprised to observe in a world where CRS doesnāt exist/ādoesnāt have impact than one in which it does. This is because it could be brought about by the actions of others (e.g., CLR).
So I guess Iād be curious about things like:
Whether and how you think that that desired world-state will look different if CRS succeeds than if CRS accomplishes very little but other groups with somewhat similar goals succeed
How you might disentangle the contribution of CRS to this desired outcome from the contributions of others
I guess this connects to the question of quality/āimpact assessment as well.
I also think this dilemma is far from unique to CRS. In fact, itās probably weaker for CRS than for non-suffering-focused longtermists (e.g. much of FHI), because there are currently more of the latter (or at least they control more resources), so there are more plausible alternative candidates for the causes of non-suffering-focused longtermist impacts.
Thanks.
Those answers make sense to me. But I notice that the answer to question 1 sounds like an outcome you want to bring about, but which I wouldnāt be way more surprised to observe in a world where CRS doesnāt exist/ādoesnāt have impact than one in which it does. This is because it could be brought about by the actions of others (e.g., CLR).
So I guess Iād be curious about things like:
Whether and how you think that that desired world-state will look different if CRS succeeds than if CRS accomplishes very little but other groups with somewhat similar goals succeed
How you might disentangle the contribution of CRS to this desired outcome from the contributions of others
I guess this connects to the question of quality/āimpact assessment as well.
I also think this dilemma is far from unique to CRS. In fact, itās probably weaker for CRS than for non-suffering-focused longtermists (e.g. much of FHI), because there are currently more of the latter (or at least they control more resources), so there are more plausible alternative candidates for the causes of non-suffering-focused longtermist impacts.
Also, do you think it might make sense for CRS to run a (small) survey about the quality & impact of its outputs?