Increasing trust without trustworthiness seems like a recipe for being taken advantage of; increasing trustworthiness (e.g. by punishing low-level antisocial behaviour) seems like the relevant target.
Related, I’m a fan of the term “justified trust” here. A wrote a bit more here.
Increasing justified trust seems great, but increasing unjustified trust is hazardous. (My guess is that the OP is mainly referring to justified trust, but it seems good to clarify)
Yeah I think this is a distinction where everyone agrees when the distinction is raised but attempting to do policymaking without the distinction front of mind can lead to accidentally aiming for the wrong thing. Thanks for re-sharing the link!
Increasing trust without trustworthiness seems like a recipe for being taken advantage of; increasing trustworthiness (e.g. by punishing low-level antisocial behaviour) seems like the relevant target.
Related, I’m a fan of the term “justified trust” here. A wrote a bit more here.
Increasing justified trust seems great, but increasing unjustified trust is hazardous. (My guess is that the OP is mainly referring to justified trust, but it seems good to clarify)
Yeah I think this is a distinction where everyone agrees when the distinction is raised but attempting to do policymaking without the distinction front of mind can lead to accidentally aiming for the wrong thing. Thanks for re-sharing the link!