Seems like this might make longtermism more scalable, and the cost of screening-off some opportunities.
The cost is lower than it naively looks because if the grantmakers are skilled, they should be able to understand what makes for a great-but-potentially-illegible grant, and forward it to other grantmakers.
The cost is lower than it naively looks because if the grantmakers are skilled, they should be able to understand what makes for a great-but-potentially-illegible grant, and forward it to other grantmakers.
Good point!