You can see this already in the comments where people without context say this is a good piece and thanking you for “all the insights”.
FWIW I Control-F’d for “all the insights” and did not see any other hit on this page other than your comment.
EDIT 2023/06/14: Hmm, so I’ve since read all the comments on this post on both the EAF and LW[1], and I don’t think your sentence was an accurate paraphrase for any of the comments on this post?
For context, the most positive comment on this post is probably mine, and astute readers might note that my comment was process-oriented rather than talking about quantity of insights.
The comment I was referring to was in fact yours. After re-reading your comment and my statement, I think I misunderstood your comment originally. I thought it was not only praising the process but also the content itself. Sorry about that.
I updated my comment accordingly to indicate my misunderstanding.
The “all the insights” was not meant as a literal quote but more as a cynical way of saying it. In hindsight, this is obviously bound to be misunderstood and I should have phrased it differently.
Thanks for the correction! I also appreciate the polite engagement.
As a quick clarification, I’m not a stickler for exact quotes (though e.g. the APA is), but I do think it’s important for paraphrases to be accurate.
I’ll also endeavor to be make my own comments harder to misinterpret going forwards, to minimize future misunderstandings.
To be clear, I also appreciate the content of this post, but more because it either brought new information to my attention, or summarized information I was aware of in the same place. (rather than because it offered particularly novel insights).
FWIW I Control-F’d for “all the insights” and did not see any other hit on this page other than your comment.
EDIT 2023/06/14: Hmm, so I’ve since read all the comments on this post on both the EAF and LW[1], and I don’t think your sentence was an accurate paraphrase for any of the comments on this post?
For context, the most positive comment on this post is probably mine, and astute readers might note that my comment was process-oriented rather than talking about quantity of insights.
(yes, I have extremely poor time management. Why do you ask?)
The comment I was referring to was in fact yours. After re-reading your comment and my statement, I think I misunderstood your comment originally. I thought it was not only praising the process but also the content itself. Sorry about that.
I updated my comment accordingly to indicate my misunderstanding.
The “all the insights” was not meant as a literal quote but more as a cynical way of saying it. In hindsight, this is obviously bound to be misunderstood and I should have phrased it differently.
Thanks for the correction! I also appreciate the polite engagement.
As a quick clarification, I’m not a stickler for exact quotes (though e.g. the APA is), but I do think it’s important for paraphrases to be accurate.
I’ll also endeavor to be make my own comments harder to misinterpret going forwards, to minimize future misunderstandings.
To be clear, I also appreciate the content of this post, but more because it either brought new information to my attention, or summarized information I was aware of in the same place. (rather than because it offered particularly novel insights).