Revisiting on the occasion of curation: AI governance seems like a high growth area right now, where a bunch of people should consider getting involved. For those who are considering it, this seems like gold dust in evaluating their fit.
It’s well-written, and I find its points compelling. For example, your bullet on “Appropriately weighing evidence” is a really well-said description of a point I’ve only vaguely gestured at before, and in all the descriptions of epistemics I’ve read, have not seen so well put.
Revisiting on the occasion of curation: AI governance seems like a high growth area right now, where a bunch of people should consider getting involved. For those who are considering it, this seems like gold dust in evaluating their fit.
It’s well-written, and I find its points compelling. For example, your bullet on “Appropriately weighing evidence” is a really well-said description of a point I’ve only vaguely gestured at before, and in all the descriptions of epistemics I’ve read, have not seen so well put.