Revisiting on the occasion of curation: AI governance seems like a high growth area right now, where a bunch of people should consider getting involved. For those who are considering it, this seems like gold dust in evaluating their fit.
It’s well-written, and I find its points compelling. For example, your bullet on “Appropriately weighing evidence” is a really well-said description of a point I’ve only vaguely gestured at before, and in all the descriptions of epistemics I’ve read, have not seen so well put.
This seems excellent to me. Very timely, very well done.
Revisiting on the occasion of curation: AI governance seems like a high growth area right now, where a bunch of people should consider getting involved. For those who are considering it, this seems like gold dust in evaluating their fit.
It’s well-written, and I find its points compelling. For example, your bullet on “Appropriately weighing evidence” is a really well-said description of a point I’ve only vaguely gestured at before, and in all the descriptions of epistemics I’ve read, have not seen so well put.
Thanks JP!