CERI Research Symposium Presentations (incl. Youtube links)

[Will Aldred]

Introduction

The Cambridge Existential Risks Initiative (CERI) summer research fellowship (SRF) is a 10-week research training programme for aspiring x-risk researchers held in Cambridge, UK. CERI SRF ’22 concluded with a research symposium on September 5th, and the presentations from that symposium are the subject of this post.^[1]

For prospective CERI applicants: CERI SRF ’23 is not yet open to applications; we’re currently evaluating our impact and considering our long term strategy. There will be a Forum post if and when we open our ’23 round. In the meantime, you may be interested in our existential risks introductory course (ERIC), or in EA Cambridge’s seminar programmes in AGI safety and biosecurity.

Presentations

CERI research symposium talks, from both ’22 and ‘21, can be found at the CERI Youtube channel.^[2] Below, I break down the ‘22 fellows’ talks by cause area, such that those interested might have a slightly easier time navigating which videos to watch.

AI risk

Technical

• Exploring and characterizing surprising generalization behavior in neural networks—Alexander Davies

  • Mentor: Lauro Langosco

• (unavailable) Infrastructure considerations for advanced ML systems—Pranav Gade

  • Mentor: Jeffrey Ladish

• Developing an ‘empathy mechanism’ for AI Agents—Tim Farrelly

  • Mentors: Ivana Dusparic, Tim Franzmeyer, and Christian Schroeder de Witt

Governance

• (unavailable) Article 15 compliance under the EU AI act: How developers and deployers of large foundation models should share regulatory burden—Somsubhro Bagchi

  • Mentor: Risto Uuk

• Understanding applications of artificial intelligence to government surveillance—Catherine Brewer

  • Mentor: Cecil Abungu

• Investigating the history of industry-led best practices for safety critical technologies and their implications on AGI governance—Yilin Huang

  • Mentor: Claire Boine

Biorisk

• Reimagining epidemic sovereignty: Rethinking global health governance of catastrophic biological risks—Hamza Tariq Chaudhry

  • Mentor: Catherine Rhodes

• Improving DNA synthesis screening to prevent malicious actors from creating dangerous pathogens—Oscar Delaney & Hanna Pálya

  • Mentors: Becky Mackleprang and Lalitha Sundaram

• Identifying technological bottlenecks in bio-surveillance systems—Brianna Gopaul & Ziyue Zeng

  • Mentor: Akhil Bansal

• Avenues for reducing time to detection and alert for infectious disease outbreaks within West African nations—Sam Pritchard

  • Mentor: Sophie Rose

Nuclear risk

• (unavailable) Effects of transformative technologies on nuclear deterrence—Nathan Barnard

  • Mentor: Matthew Gentzel

• Investigating India-Pakistan nuclear risk: What are the chances, how bad can it get, and what can we do to mitigate nuclear risk? - Vara Raturi

  • Mentor: Rishi Paul

• Machine learning and nuclear command: How the technical flaws of automated systems and a changing human-machine relationship could impact the risk of inadvertent nuclear use—Peter Rautenbach

  • Mentor: Haydn Belfield

• Disentanglement and overview of the nuclear risk field—Sarah Weiler

  • Mentor: Christian Ruhl

Extreme climate change

• Investigating the relationship between SRM research and global catastrophic and other related risks—Gideon Futerman

  • Mentors: Goodwin Gibbins and Jesse Reynolds

• (unavailable) Estimating the risks from super pest outbreaks on the global food system—Kirke Joamets

  • Mentor: anonymous

Miscellaneous and meta x-risk

• (unavailable) Cooperation and conflict between AI systems in non-causal contexts—Jim Buhler

  • Mentors: Caspar Oesterheld, Johannes Treutlein, and a third anonymous mentor

• Analysing the current space governance framework and designing more adaptive, longtermist space governance institutions—Carson Ezell

  • Mentors: Giuliana Rotola and Anders Sandberg

• Considering future generations in the political decision-making process to overcome political presentism and myopia: Comparative analysis and case studies of best and worst practice examples—Moritz Von Knebel

  • Mentors: Matt Boyd and Andrew Leigh

Acknowledgements

I’m grateful to Nandini Shiralkar for helpful comments on an earlier draft, and to Lin Bowker-Lonnecker, Nandini again, and especially Hannah Erlebach for organising our symposium. Moreover, I’m grateful for all the effort—from the fellows, mentors, and organising team—that went into this summer’s CERI fellowship. It’s a privilege to work with people like you.

CERI SRF ’22 fellows and organisers (and also three of the mentors). Photo by Graham CopeKoga.

Back row, left to right: Nathan Barnard, Tim Farrelly, Pranav Gade, Oscar Delaney, Hanna Palya, Herbie Bradley, Sam Pritchard, Will Aldred, Cecil Abungu, Lin Bowker-Lonnecker

Middle row, left to right: Vara Raturi, Catherine Brewer, Carson Ezell, Gideon Futerman, Yilin Huang, Dewi Erwan, Somsubhro Bagchi, Catherine Rhodes, Hannah Erlebach

Front row, left to right: Sarah Weiler, Ziyue Zeng, Brianna Gopaul, Nandini Shiralkar, Kirke Joamets, Lalitha Sundaram

1. ^

   Note that CERI’s theory of change is more about upskilling aspiring x-risk researchers (i.e., our fellows), with a view to counterfactually more impactful careers going forward, than it is about the direct impact of fellows’ outputs from the summer.

2. ^

   Most fellows’ symposium talks can be found on our Youtube channel. Some talks are unavailable on account of infohazards or other reasons.

[Peter]

Hey Will, do you want to put these on EA Radio alongside the Stanford Existential Risk Initiative talks?