Thanks Peter, I agree that your insight about âwhen itâs worse more people should do itâ is correct and your analogy is helpful.
But what really confuses me is the specific example I quoted where you are looking at what an AMF staff person does versus what an E2G person does. It seems like in both cases you are comparing âdonation opportunityâ, yet you are choosing the one which is worse.
An AMF staff person is like a crank turner in my exampleâit doesnât matter how much donation opportunity you create if thereâs no one there to fulfill it.
I think you are agreeing with me? We shouldnât be comparing the output of the âcrankâ, but instead be looking at what it takes to turn the crank. Therefore we shouldnât compare 2.5 M to 9.5 K, instead we should compare the salary of someone at AMF to 9.5 K.
Thanks Peter, I agree that your insight about âwhen itâs worse more people should do itâ is correct and your analogy is helpful.
But what really confuses me is the specific example I quoted where you are looking at what an AMF staff person does versus what an E2G person does. It seems like in both cases you are comparing âdonation opportunityâ, yet you are choosing the one which is worse.
An AMF staff person is like a crank turner in my exampleâit doesnât matter how much donation opportunity you create if thereâs no one there to fulfill it.
I think you are agreeing with me? We shouldnât be comparing the output of the âcrankâ, but instead be looking at what it takes to turn the crank. Therefore we shouldnât compare 2.5 M to 9.5 K, instead we should compare the salary of someone at AMF to 9.5 K.