I’m reading “OK” as “morally permissible” rather than “not harmful”. E.g., I think it’s also “OK” to eat meat, even though I think it’s causing harm.
(Not saying you should clarify the poll, it’s clear enough and will probably produce interesting results either way!)
Nice one! Read it as you will sir :D—perhaps I should have been more specific, but there are trade-offs to specificity on polls like this too.
Personally, I think no poll is complete without at least two footnotes.
Apologies for breaching forum norms. Corrected and please don’t ban me.
I’m reading “OK” as “morally permissible” rather than “not harmful”. E.g., I think it’s also “OK” to eat meat, even though I think it’s causing harm.
(Not saying you should clarify the poll, it’s clear enough and will probably produce interesting results either way!)
Nice one! Read it as you will sir :D—perhaps I should have been more specific, but there are trade-offs to specificity on polls like this too.
Personally, I think no poll is complete without at least two footnotes.
Apologies for breaching forum norms. Corrected and please don’t ban me.