You aren’t ready to receive their wisdom
We may soon develop the ability to talk to whales. To anyone with even an ounce of whimsy or curious joy, this is obviously pretty exciting. It’s hard not to imagine the radical wave of empathy that this could cause, as we realize we’re not as special as we previously thought.[1]
There are two main research groups that I know of working on this, Earth Species Project and Project CETI, and the effort to decode sperm whale communication in particular seems well under way.
I think we should seriously consider that, as a civilization, we are not ready to handle this well, and that we should aim to delay our first contact with whales, rather than doing research to accelerate it.
Some thoughts[2]:
1. Exploitation and whaling
Both ESP and Project CETI are publicly committed to open-source research, and are actively sharing their datasets, methods, and models online[3]. Project CETI intends to build “the most comprehensive open-source animal communication dataset ever created[4]”. Rather than a controlled and careful effort to bridge the human-whale divide, this technology may become highly democratized, enabling a large number of actors to independently attempt to make contact[5].
The most obvious economic use case is, unfortunately, whaling. While most countries have stopped hunting whales, there are still roughly 1500 whales killed annually, and many whale species are on the edge of extinction. The IWC has virtually no enforcement power, and it is still legal in multiple countries. Like sirens luring sailors to their deaths at sea, whalers could manipulate the behavior of whales to their advantage[6][7]. While it seems likely that communicating with them would galvanize momentum around their protection, we don’t seem to have the governance systems in place that could effectively prevent misuse.
There is also a history of the military training dolphins to perform various tasks, like surveillance, recovering equipment, or tagging underwater mines.[8] How soon after we learn to speak to whales will we recruit them to fight our wars?
2. Irreversible cultural change
With uncontacted indigenous groups in the Amazon, or on North Sentinel Island, we have developed policies to protect them and their cultures. For example a Brazilian government agency enforces no-contact for about a hundred different groups of uncontacted people, to protect them from cultural contamination and disease.
If we start talking to whales, and we are not careful, we may significantly alter their culture. Even ESP acknowledges that
experiments may run the risk of altering culture by introducing novel calls that spread in wild populations (Garland and McGregor, 2020). To mitigate these risks, we will focus on captive populations, and populations whose vocal communication is not socially learned
This could end up being an enormous tragedy, both from the perspective of the whales, and from the perspective of anyone hoping to understand and learn from whale culture. Whales may have had complex language for millions of years, which would be much longer than humans or their ancestors.
We only get to make first contact once. When we do, we should be extremely careful.[9]
3. Linguistic prejudice
Humans have historically used their language abilities and intelligence to justify their own supremacy. The rise of AI systems, who are developing superhuman language/reasoning skills, seriously challenge this justification for our place at the top. This leaves us humans with a choice:
Bite the bullet and embrace our new gods
Admit that language and intelligence weren’t that important anyways
I would hope we take this opportunity, when humanity needs to reconstruct its own identity, to lean into what we have in common with all animals: the ability to feel, to suffer.
In addition, we already heavily prioritize “charismatic” animals, like dolphins and pandas. While they are beloved, this love doesn’t obviously spill over into other animals (who are much more numerous). For example, when the first Save the Whales movement took off, while the whaling industry collapsed, the fishing industry still continued to grow.
Forming this connection with whales might reinforce the existing hierarchy, instead of collapse it.
4. Locking in wild animal suffering
We might hope that communicating with whales could lead to a moral revolution. I admit that the image of a whale, teleconferencing in via AI-drone to address the UN (calling out Norway and Japan directly, of course), would be radically badass.
That said, there is a difficult tension between our concern for animals as sentient individuals, and our concern for them at the species or ecosystem level. Whales are predators (sperm whales, for example, hunt squid), and their interests are not obviously aligned with the rest of the animal kingdom. They may also want, very reasonably, to be left alone, and given sovereignty over the seas, even at the expense of the trillions/quadrillions of other animals who live there.
I think this tension is quite serious, and we don’t yet have good answers on how to handle it. I’m deeply nervous about humanity making a big decision too early about our relationship to nature, and to all the sentient individuals who live there. Currently, most whale advocacy has come from a conservationist perspective, focused on species and ecosystems rather than individual welfare. Locking in wild animal suffering before we develop the technology and wisdom to navigate this tension could be devastatingly bad.
Conclusion
Talking to whales would be one of the coolest things to happen in my lifetime. I feel strongly that whales, like all animals, deserve a seat at the table in our parliament of the future, to advocate with dignity for their own interests.
The arguments above lead me to think that we first need to mature as a civilization, both in terms of our ability to coordinate to prevent unilateral action, and in terms of our morality and meta-moral wisdom.
In a better world, we would make contact slowly, carefully, and with the understanding that every sentient being matters, whether or not they can speak.
We would say hello, and wait to be invited.
- ^
Like how the Roger Payne album started the Save the Whales movement. I have listened to this so many times, it’s enchanting.
- ^
I do not want to imply that researchers at either organization have not already considered objections to this work. I’m just voicing my own concerns here.
- ^
Project CETI GitHub, ESP GitHub & HuggingFace.
- ^
I really wonder whether this data will make its way into frontier AI training, and what the implications are.
- ^
Despite the fact that it’s illegal to visit North Sentinel Island, a missionary in 2018 felt it was his “burden” to convert the Sentinelese (an uncontacted group) to Christianity, and was killed attempting to make contact. Even if we were to establish clear rules for first contact, that does not mean a rogue actor won’t attempt to tell the sperm whales about Jesus Christ.
- ^
Some of the technology shared publicly is not even about decoding, but on detecting and localizing whales, as a part of their data collection efforts. This tech might also be dual use, even before successful decoding.
- ^
Researchers have successfully used a robot bee to recruit honey bees to go foraging. I would hope sperm whales are less gullible...
- ^
Dolphins are currently fighting in the Ukraine war apparently???
- ^
For any Ursula K. Le Guin fans: Shouldn’t we aspire to be like the Ekumen, sending a lone envoy who can first establish contact, and personal relationships with the whales? Shouldn’t we wait to be invited?
Thanks for sharing, agree with all these concerns. Another one I’m worried about is that these kinds of efforts don’t accurately relay what animals are trying to communicate and instead just tell us what we want to hear (like we’re already seeing with misleading ‘dog translation collars’), which could be used as further justification for their exploitation and neglect.
As well as Earth Species Project and Project CETI, there’s lots of tech funding set to come into the field: Google is working on technology for communication with dolphins and the major Chinese tech firm Baidu has filed a patent for animal-human communication technology, and we’ll probably see lots of others following suit. Seeking to slow down these efforts makes sense as an end goal, but as an intermediate goal we could at least try to get as many players in the field to sign up to something like these principles drafted by the More Than Human Life program at New York University (who Project CETI has partnered with).
Talk to sperm whales --> the US military figures out how to pay them to covertly tail russian subs --> eventually more people find out about this and pretty soon thanks to whales everybody knows where everyone’s subs are at all times --> the assuredness of nations’ second-strike nuclear capability is eroded --> destabilized game-theoretic dynamics once again favor first-strike --> nuclear armageddon.
(This is 95% a joke, but if somebody would please research “do whales offer any notable advantages vs naval drones, satellite-based wake detection, or other techniques for tracking nuclear submarines” I would feel a bit more assured...)
Executive summary: The author argues that although communicating with whales would be extraordinary, humanity should consider delaying first contact because we lack the governance, moral clarity, and coordination needed to prevent exploitation, cultural harm, and premature moral lock-in.
Key points:
Open-source efforts by Earth Species Project and Project CETI could democratize whale communication tools, increasing risks of misuse such as manipulation for whaling or military purposes.
The author argues that existing governance systems are too weak to reliably prevent exploitation, citing ongoing whaling and historical military use of dolphins.
First contact could irreversibly alter whale culture, and even researchers acknowledge the risk of introducing novel calls that spread in wild populations.
The author suggests that communicating with whales may reinforce linguistic and intelligence-based hierarchies rather than expanding moral concern to all sentient beings.
There is a serious tension between individual animal welfare and ecosystem-level conservation, and premature moral or political commitments could “lock in” wild animal suffering.
The author concludes that humanity should mature morally and institutionally before making contact, ideally proceeding slowly and cautiously, “wait[ing] to be invited.”
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.