Do you think that the EA focus on your work is more because Rethink is a known/trusted org in the community and relatively unknown outside, or because the way you use language and models syncs up with how EA funders prefer to think about risk, but is more atypical outside EA? (There may be some other most important factor, of course.)
I would think it is mostly because Rethink is a known/trusted org in the community and relatively unknown outside, though I could easily it being the other part too. I don’t think I have a good feel yet for how typical national and nuclear security organizations talk yet.
Thanks for responding!
Do you think that the EA focus on your work is more because Rethink is a known/trusted org in the community and relatively unknown outside, or because the way you use language and models syncs up with how EA funders prefer to think about risk, but is more atypical outside EA? (There may be some other most important factor, of course.)
I would think it is mostly because Rethink is a known/trusted org in the community and relatively unknown outside, though I could easily it being the other part too. I don’t think I have a good feel yet for how typical national and nuclear security organizations talk yet.