Iām currently in favour of keeping scalably using labour, though I also made the entry so this shouldnāt be much of an update (itās not like a āsecond voteā, just a repeat of the first vote after hearing the new arguments).
One consideration Iād add is that maybe itās a more natural topic for a tag than a wiki entry? It seems to me like having a tag for posts relevant to a (sufficiently) interesting and recurring question makes sense?
Fwiw, I think that āscalably using labourā doesnāt sound quite like a wiki entry. I find virtually no article titles including the term āusingā on Wikipedia.
If one wants to retain the concept, I think that āLarge-scale use of labourā or something similar would be better. There are may Wikipedia article titles including the term āuse of [noun]ā. (Potentially nouns are generally better than verbs in Wikipedia article titles? Not sure.)
Iām currently in favour of keeping scalably using labour, though I also made the entry so this shouldnāt be much of an update (itās not like a āsecond voteā, just a repeat of the first vote after hearing the new arguments).
One consideration Iād add is that maybe itās a more natural topic for a tag than a wiki entry? It seems to me like having a tag for posts relevant to a (sufficiently) interesting and recurring question makes sense?
Fwiw, I think that āscalably using labourā doesnāt sound quite like a wiki entry. I find virtually no article titles including the term āusingā on Wikipedia.
If one wants to retain the concept, I think that āLarge-scale use of labourā or something similar would be better. There are may Wikipedia article titles including the term āuse of [noun]ā. (Potentially nouns are generally better than verbs in Wikipedia article titles? Not sure.)