Mmh, upon looking at Vaidehiās list more closely, it now seems to me that we should have a single article: people have proposed various other constraints besides the three mentioned, and I donāt think it would make sense to have separate articles for each of these, or to have an additional article for āother constraintsā. So I propose renaming talent vs. funding constraintsconstraints in effective altruism. Thoughts?
Done. (Though I used the name constraints on effective altruism, which seemed more accurate. I donāt have strong views on whether the preposition should be āinā or āonā, however, so feel free to change it.)
The article should be substantially revised (it was imported from EA Concepts), I think, but at least its scope is now better defined.
Great. Letās have three articles then. Feel free to split the existing one, otherwise Iāll do that tomorrow. [I know you like this kind of framing. ;) ]
Just discovered Vaidehi made a collection of discussions of constraints in EA, which could be helpful for populating whatever entries get created and maybe for deciding on scopes etc.
Mmh, upon looking at Vaidehiās list more closely, it now seems to me that we should have a single article: people have proposed various other constraints besides the three mentioned, and I donāt think it would make sense to have separate articles for each of these, or to have an additional article for āother constraintsā. So I propose renaming talent vs. funding constraints constraints in effective altruism. Thoughts?
I think that that probably makes sense.
Done. (Though I used the name constraints on effective altruism, which seemed more accurate. I donāt have strong views on whether the preposition should be āinā or āonā, however, so feel free to change it.)
The article should be substantially revised (it was imported from EA Concepts), I think, but at least its scope is now better defined.
Great. Letās have three articles then. Feel free to split the existing one, otherwise Iāll do that tomorrow. [I know you like this kind of framing. ;) ]