Cooperation & Coordinationāthis seems more high-level or strategic like donor coordination. But Iām quite uncertaināit could be include disucsion norms. I think thereās probably value for a separate tag though, because this is the kind of thing group organisers would find useful and could be quickly shared with people.
Communityāapplies but is too broad, so doesnāt help identify these posts
A tag for Discussion Norms seems useful and distinct from the other tags you mention. It also wouldnāt have to only be about discussion norms for intra-EA interactionsāit could also be about discussion norms in other contexts.
āCommunity Normsā and āPosts that discuss norms on how EAs to interact with each otherā feel very broad to me, and itās harder for me to see precisely what thatās trying to point at that isnāt captured by one of the first three other tags you mention.
But I have a feeling that something like Community Norms/āDiscussion Norms could have a clear scope thatās useful and distinct from the other tags. Maybe if you just try flesh out what you mean a little more in the description itād be clear to me?
Maybe what you have in mind will often relate to things like being welcoming, supportive, and considerate? If so, maybe adjusting the tag label or description in light of that could help?
Discussion Norms: Posts about suggested or encouraged norms within the EA community on how to interact with other EAs, which may often relate to being supportive, welcoming and considerate.
Itās still not great, if you had any feedback Iād be keen to hear it!
Update: Iāve created the tag āDiscussion Normsā
Community Norms/āDiscussion Norms
Very Bad Description: Posts that discuss norms on how EAs to interact with each other.
Posts this tag could apply to:
Robert Wiblin, Six Ways To Get Along With People Who Are Totally Wrong*
Jess Whittlestone, Supportive Scepticism
Michelle Hutchinson and Jess Whittlestone, Supportive Scepticism in Practice
Owen Cotton-Barratt, Keeping the Effective Altruism movement welcoming
The extraordinary value of ordinary norms by Emily Tench
Me, Suggestions for Online EA Discussion Norms
Considering Considerateness: Why communities of do-gooders should be exceptionally considerate by Stefan Schubert
Issues with existing tags:
Cooperation & Coordinationāthis seems more high-level or strategic like donor coordination. But Iām quite uncertaināit could be include disucsion norms. I think thereās probably value for a separate tag though, because this is the kind of thing group organisers would find useful and could be quickly shared with people.
Communityāapplies but is too broad, so doesnāt help identify these posts
Movement Strategyāalso too broad
Diversity & Inclusionātoo narrowānot all community norms are about D&I
EA Messagingātoo narrowāsometimes relevant when disucssing how you might talk to non-EAs in an EA setting (e.g. a newcomer at an event)
My quick, personal take is that:
A tag for Discussion Norms seems useful and distinct from the other tags you mention. It also wouldnāt have to only be about discussion norms for intra-EA interactionsāit could also be about discussion norms in other contexts.
āCommunity Normsā and āPosts that discuss norms on how EAs to interact with each otherā feel very broad to me, and itās harder for me to see precisely what thatās trying to point at that isnāt captured by one of the first three other tags you mention.
But I have a feeling that something like Community Norms/āDiscussion Norms could have a clear scope thatās useful and distinct from the other tags. Maybe if you just try flesh out what you mean a little more in the description itād be clear to me?
Maybe what you have in mind will often relate to things like being welcoming, supportive, and considerate? If so, maybe adjusting the tag label or description in light of that could help?
I think Discussion Norms makes sense!
Discussion Norms: Posts about suggested or encouraged norms within the EA community on how to interact with other EAs, which may often relate to being supportive, welcoming and considerate.
Itās still not great, if you had any feedback Iād be keen to hear it!