Obviously itād overlap a lot with the Forecasting tag. But if itās the case that several posts include Elicit forecasts but most posts tagged Forecasting donāt include Elicit forecasts, then I imagine a separate tag for Elicit forecasts could be useful. (Basically, what Iām thinking about is whether there would be cases in which itād be useful for someone to find /ā be sent a collection of links to just posts with Elicit forecasts, with the Forecasting tag not covering their needs well.)
But maybe a better option would be to mirror LessWrong in having a tag for posts about forecasting and another tag for posts that include actual forecasts (see here)? (Or maybe the latter tag should only include posts that quite prominently include forecasts, rather than just including them in passing here and there.) Because maybe people would also want to see posts with Metaculus forecasts in them, or forecasts from Good Judgement Inc, or just forecasts from individual EAs but not using those platforms. And Iād guess itād make more sense to have one tag where all of these things can be found than to try to have a separate tag for each.
(Thatās just my quick thoughts in a tired state, though.)
It could also be handy to have a tag for posts relevant to āOught /ā ElicitāāI think itād probably be good to bundle them together but note Elicit explicitlyāsimilarly to how thereās now tags for posts relevant to each of a few other orgs (e.g. Rethink Priorities, FHI, GPI, QURI). So maybe the combination of a tag for posts that contain actual forecasts and a tag for Ought /ā Elicit would serve the role a tag for posts containing Elicit forecasts would?
This seems plausibly useful to me.
Obviously itād overlap a lot with the Forecasting tag. But if itās the case that several posts include Elicit forecasts but most posts tagged Forecasting donāt include Elicit forecasts, then I imagine a separate tag for Elicit forecasts could be useful. (Basically, what Iām thinking about is whether there would be cases in which itād be useful for someone to find /ā be sent a collection of links to just posts with Elicit forecasts, with the Forecasting tag not covering their needs well.)
But maybe a better option would be to mirror LessWrong in having a tag for posts about forecasting and another tag for posts that include actual forecasts (see here)? (Or maybe the latter tag should only include posts that quite prominently include forecasts, rather than just including them in passing here and there.) Because maybe people would also want to see posts with Metaculus forecasts in them, or forecasts from Good Judgement Inc, or just forecasts from individual EAs but not using those platforms. And Iād guess itād make more sense to have one tag where all of these things can be found than to try to have a separate tag for each.
(Thatās just my quick thoughts in a tired state, though.)
It could also be handy to have a tag for posts relevant to āOught /ā ElicitāāI think itād probably be good to bundle them together but note Elicit explicitlyāsimilarly to how thereās now tags for posts relevant to each of a few other orgs (e.g. Rethink Priorities, FHI, GPI, QURI). So maybe the combination of a tag for posts that contain actual forecasts and a tag for Ought /ā Elicit would serve the role a tag for posts containing Elicit forecasts would?