I guess that introduces another potential confusion though, because the scores (e.g. 0.78 for the Czech Republic) is ‘Longtermist score’ minus ‘Neartermist score’. “Neartermism—Longtermism” might lead people to think high scores mean strong interest in neartermist cause areas.
Thanks both! I think Jamie’s adjusted version, where we spell out the word “minus” and write “Positive numbers indicate relatively more Longtermism prioritisation” hopefully clarifies things.
I think a useful/easy fix could be to change the title to “Neartermism—Longtermism”
I guess that introduces another potential confusion though, because the scores (e.g. 0.78 for the Czech Republic) is ‘Longtermist score’ minus ‘Neartermist score’. “Neartermism—Longtermism” might lead people to think high scores mean strong interest in neartermist cause areas.
Thanks both! I think Jamie’s adjusted version, where we spell out the word “minus” and write “Positive numbers indicate relatively more Longtermism prioritisation” hopefully clarifies things.
Good point