I find the font to be less readable and somewhat clunky. Can’t quite express why it feels that way. It reminds me of display scaling issues, where your display resolution doesn’t match the native resolution.
Can’t quite express why it feels that way. It reminds me of display scaling issues, where your display resolution doesn’t match the native resolution.
Now that you mention it, I feel a bit the same. It might be that we just need to get used to it, but maybe it’s the font-weight?
font-weight
Is the second one better? I just changed font-weight from 450 to 400
I find the second one more readable.
Might be due to my display: If I zoom into the two versions, the second version separates letters better.
But you’re also right, that we’ll get used to most changes :)
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I find the font to be less readable and somewhat clunky.
Can’t quite express why it feels that way. It reminds me of display scaling issues, where your display resolution doesn’t match the native resolution.
Now that you mention it, I feel a bit the same. It might be that we just need to get used to it, but maybe it’s the
font-weight
?Is the second one better? I just changed font-weight from 450 to 400
I find the second one more readable.
Might be due to my display: If I zoom into the two versions, the second version separates letters better.
But you’re also right, that we’ll get used to most changes :)