I’d like to push back slightly against the notion of “apologizing” for writing something that others found hard to understand. The EA Forum should be a place to try out different kinds of content, and even if some experiments don’t work out, it’s generally good that experiments happen.
(That said, if you’re feeling apologetic, there’s also no problem with apologizing! I just want others who see this to know that it’s okay when a post doesn’t work out.)
+1, way more persuasive than the intense model.
And now Vipul’s donation report is the most persuasive case for the Hotel I’ve seen so far.
I wrote that intense model, and I agree that it’s not a good post. My apologies.
I’d like to push back slightly against the notion of “apologizing” for writing something that others found hard to understand. The EA Forum should be a place to try out different kinds of content, and even if some experiments don’t work out, it’s generally good that experiments happen.
(That said, if you’re feeling apologetic, there’s also no problem with apologizing! I just want others who see this to know that it’s okay when a post doesn’t work out.)
To be clear, I’m quite glad you attempted the model and I agree there’s no need to apologize for it.
No worries :-)