No thoughts on part 3., but I thought that your thinking in parts 1. and 2. were clear. Making this comment because the conclusions you point to are inconvenient but I think correct, and in similar past situations I’ve found it helpful to get confirmation from other people.
Agreed. The style is slightly different than what I’m used to, but the arguments seem correct and forceful. In particular the arguments against taking common-sense morality too far seems a) correct and b) important to our community’s[1] self-conception, that we can’t just elide easily.
No thoughts on part 3., but I thought that your thinking in parts 1. and 2. were clear. Making this comment because the conclusions you point to are inconvenient but I think correct, and in similar past situations I’ve found it helpful to get confirmation from other people.
Agreed. The style is slightly different than what I’m used to, but the arguments seem correct and forceful. In particular the arguments against taking common-sense morality too far seems a) correct and b) important to our community’s[1] self-conception, that we can’t just elide easily.
or at least mine