I agree with Linch’s point that there hasn’t been a previous rule around strong language not resulting in a front page ban.
To be clear, that was not my exact claim. My claim was that correctness has not historically been a frontpage/personal post distinction.
Thanks for clarifying Linch, removing the reference to your comment since it’s making a different claim.
(out of curiosity, do you agree with that statement as it stands?)
tbh I’m confused about the double negative and I’m not entirely sure what the exact statement I might be agreeing with is.
The point is that it seemed like the post was banned from the front page because of strong language, and this doesn’t see to have been a rule that has been enforced in the past.
To be clear, that was not my exact claim. My claim was that correctness has not historically been a frontpage/personal post distinction.
Thanks for clarifying Linch, removing the reference to your comment since it’s making a different claim.
(out of curiosity, do you agree with that statement as it stands?)
tbh I’m confused about the double negative and I’m not entirely sure what the exact statement I might be agreeing with is.
The point is that it seemed like the post was banned from the front page because of strong language, and this doesn’t see to have been a rule that has been enforced in the past.