There are many (most?) EAs who do not have a direct high-impact career or do a lot of high-impact volunteering. So roughly the other way of having impact is earning to give, and if people can give 10%, I think that should qualify.
I don’t understand the reasoning behind this. The goal shouldn’t be to allow everyone to “have an impact”, and people can definitely “have an impact” by donating 10%, regardless of whether it counts as earning to give.
I guess as long as there is another category (like “other”), it’s ok. But I believe one EAG exit survey didn’t have another category, so one person I heard from felt excluded.
I don’t understand the reasoning behind this. The goal shouldn’t be to allow everyone to “have an impact”, and people can definitely “have an impact” by donating 10%, regardless of whether it counts as earning to give.
I guess as long as there is another category (like “other”), it’s ok. But I believe one EAG exit survey didn’t have another category, so one person I heard from felt excluded.