I’m also happy to have my posts used for this process. (Though some were written with or on behalf of people/orgs who I can’t speak for, so if you would be interested in using my posts for this and making the results public, just let me know so I can check with those people/orgs first.)
If you do use my posts for this, you could perhaps also compare the results from your process to the results of my survey of the quality and impact of things I’ve written (as I sort-of suggest in another comment).
No—for all posts where this is the case, the post will say so near the top or bottom (usually in italics).
Also, btw, I think if it’s just that I acknowledge a person for helpful comments and discussions, there’d be no need to check with them. I just feel it’d be worth checking in cases where a person is acknowledged as a coauthor (or as having written an earlier draft that my post is based on), or where I say a post is “written for [organisation]”.
Thanks for this interesting post.
I’m also happy to have my posts used for this process. (Though some were written with or on behalf of people/orgs who I can’t speak for, so if you would be interested in using my posts for this and making the results public, just let me know so I can check with those people/orgs first.)
If you do use my posts for this, you could perhaps also compare the results from your process to the results of my survey of the quality and impact of things I’ve written (as I sort-of suggest in another comment).
Are there any posts for which this is the case but where this isn’t stated in the post?
No—for all posts where this is the case, the post will say so near the top or bottom (usually in italics).
Also, btw, I think if it’s just that I acknowledge a person for helpful comments and discussions, there’d be no need to check with them. I just feel it’d be worth checking in cases where a person is acknowledged as a coauthor (or as having written an earlier draft that my post is based on), or where I say a post is “written for [organisation]”.
Cheers, thanks