Regarding tooling, it may be very helpful to input subjective distributionsâuncertainty seems to me to be very important here, mostly if we expect this kind of tool to be used by a low number of people
Yea, Iâd love to see things like this, but itâs all a lot of work. The existing tooling is quite bad, and it will probably be a while before we could rig it up with Foretold/âGuesstimate/âSquiggle.
Another ideaâto be able to use units in cells such that the end result will depend on them. Say, for scale one can write â20000 QALYsâ or â400 BCLsâ (Broiler Chicken Lives) or â2% XpCâ (X-risk per Century)
Regarding tooling, it may be very helpful to input subjective distributionsâuncertainty seems to me to be very important here, mostly if we expect this kind of tool to be used by a low number of people
Yea, Iâd love to see things like this, but itâs all a lot of work. The existing tooling is quite bad, and it will probably be a while before we could rig it up with Foretold/âGuesstimate/âSquiggle.
Another ideaâto be able to use units in cells such that the end result will depend on them. Say, for scale one can write â20000 QALYsâ or â400 BCLsâ (Broiler Chicken Lives) or â2% XpCâ (X-risk per Century)
Yep, I think this is quite useful/âobvious. (If I understand it correctly). Work though :)