In “I don’t trust them”, I think Throwaway151 is referring to Kremer and Kemp, not Torres—as you said you didn’t think he had reached out to Kremer and Kemp.
Throwaway151 should have asked Kemp and Cremer about the claim regardless though, and included their response in the post—even if just to disagree with it.
I assumed it was referring to whoever told the anonymized author of the post about the fact that Emile was originally a co-author. (Which, as has now been clarified, isn’t really true.)
But the fact that someone can post like this on the forum, admittedly without trying to verify the claims he doesn’t trust, seems bad, and I’m glad Lizka said they would be investigating - I just hope that the moderator’s investigation includes the anonymized poster of the original, now refuted claims.
In “I don’t trust them”, I think Throwaway151 is referring to Kremer and Kemp, not Torres—as you said you didn’t think he had reached out to Kremer and Kemp.
Throwaway151 should have asked Kemp and Cremer about the claim regardless though, and included their response in the post—even if just to disagree with it.
I assumed it was referring to whoever told the anonymized author of the post about the fact that Emile was originally a co-author. (Which, as has now been clarified, isn’t really true.)
But the fact that someone can post like this on the forum, admittedly without trying to verify the claims he doesn’t trust, seems bad, and I’m glad Lizka said they would be investigating - I just hope that the moderator’s investigation includes the anonymized poster of the original, now refuted claims.