“JBS published in 2023 the commitment to banning ear notching by 2023” is a really clunky way of saying two things about the same year (ie I’d expect “by the end of the year” or something, instead of “by 2023”), how sure are you the 2nd 2023 couldn’t be a typo?
Rebecca
Karma: 1,800
the fact you mention it suggests it’s significant to you
This seems like quite a stretch.
What other disciplines would you want to see?
It seems appropriate for a quick take imo
Do we know they are being actually deleted, rather than just taken offline?
What further actions would Trump/Rubio need to take to properly execute the waiver?
Emphasising it being Bush’s legacy might help? Ie that it’s a Republican rather than Democrat achievement
That is what I understood Russell to be saying? See:
I realized that if you were even arguing about abortion, then you must value human fetuses(which look a lot like chicken fetuses) 8,650 times more than tortured, murdered chickens.
Lack of transparency around the full distribution of decision timeframes, and other aspects of the process, means it’s difficult to make an informed choice the first time around. And one bad experience can be enough to burn people long term, particularly if theyre making the reasonable assumption that LTFF is representative of the average funder.
I read Vasco as suggesting exactly that—what is your understanding of what he meant, if not that?
I’m confused by the wording of your bet—I thought you had been arguing than more than 90% are by GV, not ‘more than 90% are by a non-GV funder’
LinkedIn has made automated scraping against their ToS, so anyone attempting this should be aware that their account may get banned
In Catholicism, priests are considered sacred chosen instruments by and for god, to mediate between him and lay people. If a given priest is bad, that throws into question whether god has poor judgement, but god is almighty so he doesn’t make mistakes. (Even more so if the pope is implicated, as his word is the direct word of god). Therefore probably he doesn’t exist.
Only later denominations conceptualise faith as primarily a direct relationship between you and god, in part as a response to this dilemma. But if you’re Roman Catholic, your whole religion is thrown into question by widespread priest criminality, and it seems reasonable to have a more modern response than Martin Luther starting a whole new religion, and just conclude that god actually doesn’t exist.
A list like that could be added to the EA Handbook, which is linked on the forum sidebar
Where does 4a come from? I read the WSJ piece but don’t remember that
Yeah the point about needing to learn the relevant skills/norms makes sense to me. I just feel nervous about assuming that because a kid doesn’t seem to be negatively affected by their parents being suspicious of them, that they aren’t—knowing how much of a negative effect from another person on your wellbeing and sense of self you ought to tolerate is also a thing to be learned.
I’m curious if you remember how you felt about these things as a child, or where you get this model of kids’ psychology from? as this was basically the opposite of my experience as a kid.
I would have thought ‘my tummy hurts’ would be fairly easy to articulate, but possibly I’m overrating the relevant abilities
As someone without kids, I’m a bit confused by this—why would it not be the default to e.g. ask her why she needs to go again from the second time onwards?
Some people are, but I’d say that the overall vibe of that thread is leaning against until at least when it stops being a live issue