Phil Torres is not currently a deadname...he name Phil is displayed prominently on their web page.
I do not think this is a fair characterization of what the page contains. His name is only displayed within an image of the cover of books he wrote beforehand, and in exact quotes. That said, even though I don’t think he actually has said his former name is upsetting or offensive to him, I think the norm of calling people what they request to be called, and not using their former name, is a reasonable one.
That’s completely fair—but as I said, “I don’t think he actually has said his former name is upsetting or offensive to him, I think the norm of calling people what they request to be called, and not using their former name, is a reasonable one.”
I do not think this is a fair characterization of what the page contains. His name is only displayed within an image of the cover of books he wrote beforehand, and in exact quotes. That said, even though I don’t think he actually has said his former name is upsetting or offensive to him, I think the norm of calling people what they request to be called, and not using their former name, is a reasonable one.
No, in addition to the 12 places you mention it is also at the bottom of every page:
and elsewhere on the website, in much the same usage as this post:
That’s completely fair—but as I said, “I don’t think he actually has said his former name is upsetting or offensive to him, I think the norm of calling people what they request to be called, and not using their former name, is a reasonable one.”