Iām not sure about what you mean by ārelative encephalic massā, but you can see a model of the relative harm of various animal products here. It suggests that (ignoring the effects on climate change), you would need to weigh the suffering of 1 cow >50 times more than the equivalent suffering of a hen to consider eggs less harmful per-kcal
You can find more estimates here. The vast majority of estimates consider eggs more harmful than beef, but indeed, they donāt weigh by neuron count (it might be worth noting that, afaik, estimates like QALYs used for humans also donāt weigh by neuron count or brain mass)
Iām not sure about what you mean by ārelative encephalic massā, but you can see a model of the relative harm of various animal products here. It suggests that (ignoring the effects on climate change), you would need to weigh the suffering of 1 cow >50 times more than the equivalent suffering of a hen to consider eggs less harmful per-kcal
You can find more estimates here. The vast majority of estimates consider eggs more harmful than beef, but indeed, they donāt weigh by neuron count (it might be worth noting that, afaik, estimates like QALYs used for humans also donāt weigh by neuron count or brain mass)
Dear Lorenzo,
Thank you very much. It is clear that there is consensus on the large neg-utility of eggs. I correct this in my post.