I cannot see the inconsistency there either, the whole section seems a bit strange as his “no death” example starts also containing death again about half way through.
(Note your first line seems to be missing some *’s)
Fixed, thanks.
I cannot see the inconsistency there either, the whole section seems a bit strange as his “no death” example starts also containing death again about half way through.
(Note your first line seems to be missing some *’s)
Fixed, thanks.