I totally agree that this is a useful case to look into! I just wish that the post actually looked into it, rather than simply stating that it would be useful without justifying it.
(I also think that you could just change the title + thesis of the post to something else, and that would also be a good post.)
Thanks for the feedback! I agree the title was not great in that it poorly represented the contents, which is more like “argument via a single extended hypothetical example that was elaborated on.” This was an issue that was brought up in the review stage, but I didn’t think of a better title after some time and decided that publishing was better than waiting.
EDIT: As an update, the title has indeed been changed.
I totally agree that this is a useful case to look into! I just wish that the post actually looked into it, rather than simply stating that it would be useful without justifying it.
(I also think that you could just change the title + thesis of the post to something else, and that would also be a good post.)
Thanks for the feedback! I agree the title was not great in that it poorly represented the contents, which is more like “argument via a single extended hypothetical example that was elaborated on.” This was an issue that was brought up in the review stage, but I didn’t think of a better title after some time and decided that publishing was better than waiting.
EDIT: As an update, the title has indeed been changed.