What makes you think it isn’t a top priority to train more leaders?
Put another way, what is your current impression of EA’s “top priorities”, on a community building / professional development level?
(CEA is keen on giving people opportunities to run projects, they pay for books and other resources on professional development, and overall seem to care a lot about helping staff prepare for future leadership if they want to do so. I’d guess that Open Phil and other longstanding orgs are similar?)
This seems related to Ben Todd’s recent comment that EA has a leadership bottleneck. If true, why is training more leaders not a top priority? Maybe I’m misunderstanding something. https://twitter.com/ben_j_todd/status/1423318856622346249
What makes you think it isn’t a top priority to train more leaders?
Put another way, what is your current impression of EA’s “top priorities”, on a community building / professional development level?
(CEA is keen on giving people opportunities to run projects, they pay for books and other resources on professional development, and overall seem to care a lot about helping staff prepare for future leadership if they want to do so. I’d guess that Open Phil and other longstanding orgs are similar?)