Cost-benefit analysis

TagLast edit: 12 Jul 2022 0:41 UTC by Pablo

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a collection of methods for evaluating the social costs and benefits of alternative social arrangements.

Cost-benefit analysis estimates the ratio between the cost and the benefit of the intervention. Interventions with a lower ratio are said to provide a higher return. Cost-benefit analysis can be used in finance or business to refer only to private returns to an intervention, but in the context of effective altruism, it is more relevant to consider social costs and social benefits.

In cost-benefit analysis, both cost and benefit are measured in monetary terms (in contrast to cost-effectiveness analysis, where benefits are expressed in terms of some non-monetary outcome). Costs are generally already monetary. However, the outcomes of a program may be primarily non-monetary (for instance, the program might mostly have impact by improving health). In such cases, a monetary value will be assigned to the non-monetary unit (for instance, a value will be assigned to a year of additional healthy life). Then all non-monetary benefits will be converted into a monetary form, for comparison with costs. The valuation of non-monetary benefits is often a difficult and contentious aspect of cost-benefit analysis.

Cost-benefit analysis can be carried out on an average level (looking at the total cost and total impact of an intervention), or at the marginal level (examining the impact of an additional dollar).

Further reading

Bronsteen, John, Christopher Buccafusco & Jonathan S. Masur (2012) Well-being analysis vs. cost-benefit analysis, Duke Law Journal, vol. 62, pp. 1603–1689.

Hansson, Sven Ove (2019) Cost-benefit analysis: Philosophical issues, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2388–2391.

Sen, Amartya (2000) The discipline of cost-benefit analysis, The Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 29, pp. 931–952.

Weimer, David L. (2019) Cost-benefit analysis, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2383–2388.

Related entries

cost-effectiveness | cost-effectiveness analysis | economics | welfare economics

Eco­nomics, pri­ori­ti­sa­tion, and pro-rich bias

John G. Halstead2 Jan 2018 22:33 UTC
5 points
26 comments5 min readEA link

[Question] Is­sues with Us­ing Willing­ness-to-Pay as a Pri­mary Tool for Welfare Analysis

charrin26 Jun 2021 7:26 UTC
25 points
9 comments1 min readEA link

LW4EA: How Much is Your Time Worth?

Jeremy19 Apr 2022 2:03 UTC
9 points
3 comments1 min readEA link

To fund re­search, or not to fund re­search, that is the question

Jack Malde24 Apr 2022 18:46 UTC
20 points
5 comments7 min readEA link

[Question] Re­sources on the ex­pected value of found­ing a for-profit start-up?

Mathieu Putz5 Apr 2021 20:38 UTC
6 points
5 comments1 min readEA link

Is there some­thing like GiveWell for gov­ern­ment pro­grams?

aoreidmarr20 Dec 2021 22:25 UTC
10 points
6 comments1 min readEA link

Welfare Es­ti­ma­tion 101: Money is not Fungible

Richard Bruns10 Feb 2022 16:43 UTC
13 points
5 comments4 min readEA link

Welfare Es­ti­ma­tion 201: Un­der­stand­ing Life-Valu­a­tion Variability

Richard Bruns10 Feb 2022 19:49 UTC
12 points
1 comment11 min readEA link

Welfare Es­ti­ma­tion 103: 2 + 2 is Some­times 5

Richard Bruns10 Feb 2022 17:53 UTC
8 points
0 comments2 min readEA link

Welfare Es­ti­ma­tion 102: Welfare is a Myth

Richard Bruns10 Feb 2022 16:44 UTC
10 points
0 comments7 min readEA link

Valu­ing Leisure Time

Richard Bruns21 Apr 2022 16:17 UTC
23 points
5 comments9 min readEA link

Wor­ld­view Diver­sity and Welfare Analysis

Richard Bruns27 Apr 2022 16:22 UTC
7 points
0 comments5 min readEA link

EA should seek out more crit­i­cism of key EA concepts

freedomandutility30 Aug 2022 15:14 UTC
7 points
4 comments1 min readEA link

GiveWell should fund an SMC replication

Seth Ariel Green28 Oct 2022 12:31 UTC
79 points
17 comments5 min readEA link